Observational study finds higher preservative intake linked to increased diabetes risk — Evidence Review

Higher intake of certain food preservatives is linked to increased risks of type 2 diabetes and some cancers, according to a large French cohort study. Most related research supports these findings, with other observational studies also identifying associations between food additive exposure and elevated diabetes and cancer risks; findings are consistent with emerging evidence but causality remains unproven.

• Multiple large-scale cohort studies have demonstrated associations between the consumption of food additives—particularly emulsifiers, preservatives, and mixtures—and increased incidence of type 2 diabetes, aligning closely with the new findings 1 3 4.
• Several studies report links between food additive nitrates, nitrites, and specific cancers (breast, prostate), supporting the observed associations with certain preservatives and cancer types, though not all additives or cancers show consistent associations 5 6 8.
• The mechanistic evidence from experimental research and reviews further supports potential pathways through which preservatives may impact metabolic and cancer risk, but human interventional data are limited and more research is needed to clarify causality and underlying mechanisms 7 12 13.

Study Overview and Key Findings

With concerns growing over the global rise in ultra-processed food consumption, this study addresses pressing public health questions about the safety of common food preservatives. Utilizing data from over 100,000 French adults followed for up to 14 years, the research examines links between intake of specific preservatives and the risks of type 2 diabetes and cancer. Importantly, it assesses both overall preservative exposure and individual compounds, providing a nuanced understanding of these associations and highlighting potential regulatory implications.

Property	Value
Organization	University College Dublin
Journal Name	Nature Communications, BMJ
Authors	Mathilde Touvier
Population	French adults
Sample Size	n=100,000
Methods	Observational Study
Outcome	Risk of type 2 diabetes and cancer associated with preservatives
Results	Higher preservative intake linked to 47% increased diabetes risk

Literature Review: Related Studies

To contextualize these findings, we searched the Consensus database, which indexes over 200 million research papers. The following queries were used to identify relevant studies:

1. food preservatives diabetes risk
2. preservatives cancer risk
3. dietary additives health effects

Summary Table

Topic	Key Findings
Do food preservatives and additives increase the risk of type 2 diabetes?	- Large cohort studies found that higher intake of emulsifiers and other food additives is associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes 1 3 4. - Mixtures of food additives, including commonly used preservatives and emulsifiers, may act synergistically to elevate diabetes risk beyond that of individual compounds 3 4.
Are food preservatives linked to cancer risk, and which compounds are of concern?	- Some preservatives, especially nitrates, nitrites, and sorbates, are associated with higher risks of breast and prostate cancers, while overall cancer risk associations are less consistent 5 6 8. - Abuse of preservatives and certain meat processing practices can increase the formation of carcinogenic compounds, though the link between typical dietary exposure and cancer remains under investigation 7 8.
How strong is the evidence for causality and what are the potential mechanisms?	- Most associations are based on observational data, limiting causal inference, but mechanistic studies suggest pathways involving gut microbiota disruption, inflammation, and formation of genotoxic compounds 7 12 13. - Experimental and animal studies support the plausibility of adverse metabolic and cancer effects, but evidence from human intervention trials is limited 12 13.
What is the prevalence and regulatory context of food additive intake?	- Food additives, including preservatives, are widely consumed, with some additives present in over 90% of the population's diet in large French cohorts 10. - Current regulations may not fully account for cumulative or mixture effects, and further research is needed to inform risk assessment and policy changes 9 10 11.

---

Do food preservatives and additives increase the risk of type 2 diabetes?

Recent observational studies in large French cohorts reported that higher intake of food additives—including emulsifiers, mixtures of preservatives, and specific compounds—are associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes. These findings are consistent with the new study, which also observed a significant association between preservative consumption and diabetes incidence.

• Multiple studies identified associations between higher intake of emulsifiers (such as carrageenan, guar gum, xanthan gum, and tripotassium phosphate) and increased diabetes risk 1 4.
• Analyses of additive mixtures indicate that combinations of commonly used additives may have synergistic or additive effects on diabetes risk, suggesting that real-world exposures can be more harmful than individual additive assessments imply 3.
• The magnitude of association for diabetes risk observed in the new study (up to 47% increased risk) aligns with hazard ratios reported in these prior large cohorts 1 3 4.
• Mechanistic evidence points to gut microbiota disruption and inflammation as possible mediators of the relationship between additives and metabolic disease 1 12 13.

Are food preservatives linked to cancer risk, and which compounds are of concern?

The evidence linking food preservatives to cancer is more nuanced, with some studies supporting associations for specific compounds (notably nitrates, nitrites, and sorbates) and cancer types (breast, prostate), while overall cancer risk shows weaker or inconsistent links. The new study's findings are in line with this pattern, reporting increased risks for certain cancers and preservatives but not for all compounds or cancer types.

• High consumption of food additive nitrates and nitrites was associated with increased breast and prostate cancer risk, but not with overall cancer 5.
• Observational studies in different populations found that preserved foods (pickled, salted, fermented) are associated with higher cancer risk, particularly for prostate and gastrointestinal cancers 6 8.
• Experimental and mechanistic research demonstrates that preservatives can contribute to the formation of carcinogenic compounds, especially under some food processing or abuse scenarios 7.
• The new study's findings on potassium sorbate, sulfites, sodium nitrite, and acetates are supported by mechanistic and epidemiological evidence of potential carcinogenicity 5 6 7 8.

How strong is the evidence for causality and what are the potential mechanisms?

While observational studies consistently show associations between food additives/preservatives and adverse health outcomes, causal inference is limited by potential confounding and measurement error. Mechanistic research supports biological plausibility, but direct evidence from intervention studies in humans remains scarce.

• Most human studies are observational and cannot entirely rule out residual confounding or reverse causation 1 3 4 5.
• Mechanistic studies suggest that preservatives may alter gut microbiota, promote inflammation, impair glucose metabolism, and contribute to the formation of genotoxic or carcinogenic compounds (e.g., N-nitroso compounds) 7 12 13.
• Preclinical research demonstrates that preservatives and other additives can disrupt gut barrier function and immune regulation 12 13.
• The regulatory landscape is challenged by the lack of mixture assessments and limited human intervention data 9 10 11.

What is the prevalence and regulatory context of food additive intake?

Food additives, including preservatives, are widely present in the diets of industrialized populations, with a significant proportion of adults exposed to multiple compounds daily. Current regulations typically assess additive safety in isolation, not accounting for cumulative or mixture effects highlighted by recent research.

• Studies in France and elsewhere report that many additives are consumed by over half—and some by nearly all—of the adult population, often in complex mixtures 10.
• There is increasing recognition of the need to update regulatory frameworks to address combined exposures and to prioritize research on vulnerable populations, such as children 9 10 11.
• Calls for limiting nonessential additives and favoring minimally processed foods are supported by emerging epidemiological and mechanistic evidence 3 9 11.
• The new study's recommendation for re-evaluating preservative regulations aligns with this broader trend in public health research and policy 10 11.

Future Research Questions

Despite important advances, many questions remain unanswered regarding the health impacts of food preservatives. Future studies are needed to clarify causality, identify high-risk compounds and mixtures, and inform effective regulatory and public health actions.

Research Question	Relevance
Which food preservatives pose the highest risk for type 2 diabetes in diverse populations?	Identifying the most problematic preservatives across different demographics will help target interventions and regulatory changes; current evidence is mostly from French cohorts and may not generalize globally 1 3 4.
What mechanisms link food preservatives to increased diabetes and cancer risk?	Understanding the biological pathways (e.g., gut microbiota, inflammation, genotoxicity) is essential for developing targeted preventive strategies and confirming causality 7 12 13.
How do mixtures of food additives affect metabolic and cancer risk compared to individual additives?	Most people are exposed to multiple additives simultaneously; investigating mixture effects is critical for real-world risk assessment and may reveal synergistic or antagonistic effects not seen with single compounds 3 10.
Can clinical trials confirm the causal relationship between preservative intake and disease risk?	Observational studies suggest associations but cannot prove causality; randomized controlled trials or well-designed interventions are needed to guide evidence-based policy and dietary recommendations 1 3 4 12.
What regulatory changes could effectively reduce population-level exposure to potentially harmful preservatives?	Translating research into policy requires understanding which interventions (e.g., labeling, reformulation, bans) are most effective at protecting public health, especially among vulnerable groups 9 10 11.