Observational study suggests 50% heritability of lifespan among twin cohorts — Evidence Review
Published in Science, by researchers from Leiden University, University of Exeter
Researched by
— the AI search engine for science
Table of Contents
A new study suggests that about 50% of human lifespan may be determined by genetics, a much higher estimate than previous research. Most earlier studies have found lower heritability, so this finding from the journal Science is notable and somewhat controversial.
- Previous large-scale twin and pedigree studies typically estimated human lifespan heritability between 6% and 30%, attributing a greater role to environmental and lifestyle factors; the new study’s 50% estimate is significantly higher and challenges this consensus 1 3 4 5 6.
- Some animal research, such as studies in mice, has shown heritability estimates for lifespan closer to 50%, supporting the plausibility of higher genetic influence in specific contexts 7; however, whether these findings translate directly to humans remains debated.
- Methodological differences—such as improved modeling to account for extrinsic mortality factors in the new study—may partly explain the higher heritability estimate, highlighting the importance of study design in interpreting genetic contributions to longevity 1 3 4.
Study Overview and Key Findings
Understanding the genetic contribution to human longevity has been a longstanding challenge, with implications for medicine, public health, and aging research. Most prior estimates of lifespan heritability have been much lower than those found in this new work, raising questions about the role of genetics versus environment. The new study is particularly significant because it introduces a novel mathematical approach to separate genetic from environmental causes of death, potentially changing how scientists interpret the influence of genetics on lifespan.
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Study Year | 2023 |
| Organization | Leiden University, University of Exeter |
| Journal Name | Science |
| Authors | Joris Deelen, Luke Pilling |
| Population | Twin cohorts from Sweden, Denmark, and the U.S. |
| Methods | Observational Study |
| Outcome | Heritability of lifespan and genetic influences |
| Results | Lifespan heritability estimated at around 50%. |
Literature Review: Related Studies
To place these findings in context, we searched the Consensus paper database, which includes over 200 million research papers. The following search queries were used:
- lifespan heritability genetic factors
- inheritance lifespan studies
- environmental impact lifespan variation
Below, we summarize findings from related studies, grouped by major research themes:
| Topic | Key Findings |
|---|---|
| How heritable is human lifespan, and what are the key genetic influences? | - Most twin and pedigree studies estimate human lifespan heritability at 10–30%, often citing non-additive genetic effects and a strong influence of individual-specific environment 1 3 4 5 6. - Recent meta-analyses and GWAS have identified multiple genetic loci associated with longevity, but common variants explain only a modest fraction of lifespan variation 2 4 5 8. |
| How do environmental and lifestyle factors interact with genetic determinants? | - Environmental degradation, health expenditure, clean water, and sanitation significantly affect life expectancy, especially in polluted or low-resource settings, sometimes outweighing genetic factors 9. - Many genetically influenced risk factors for lifespan (such as blood pressure or tobacco exposure) are potentially modifiable, highlighting the interplay of genetics and lifestyle 4 5. |
| How do heritability estimates compare between humans and animal models? | - Animal studies, particularly in mice and Drosophila, often find higher heritability estimates for lifespan (up to 50% or more), with genetic, environmental, and sex-specific effects 7 10. - The context-dependence of genetic architecture in model organisms suggests that estimates may vary significantly with population, environment, and methodology 7 10. |
| What methodological challenges complicate lifespan heritability research? | - Traditional heritability estimates can be inflated by assortative mating and shared environments, leading to overestimation of genetic effects 3. - Accurate separation of intrinsic (genetic) versus extrinsic (environmental or accidental) causes of death is difficult, and lack of detailed cause-of-death data limits precision in human studies 1 3. |
How heritable is human lifespan, and what are the key genetic influences?
The new study’s estimate of lifespan heritability (~50%) is considerably higher than most previous research, which generally placed heritability between 10% and 30% for humans. While genome-wide association studies have identified some genetic loci linked to longevity, these typically explain only a small proportion of lifespan variation. The new findings suggest that prior estimates may have undercounted genetic effects due to methodological limitations.
- Large twin studies in Denmark found heritability estimates of 23–26% for longevity, with non-additive genetic and non-shared environmental factors predominating 1.
- Recent meta-analyses have identified multiple longevity genes, including APOE and others, but the collective impact of these variants is modest 2 4 5 8.
- Some studies argue that previous heritability estimates are inflated due to unrecognized assortative mating and shared environment 3.
- The new study’s approach, which mathematically separates external factors, may provide a more accurate (but also potentially population-specific) estimate 1 3.
How do environmental and lifestyle factors interact with genetic determinants?
There is broad agreement that environment and lifestyle play crucial roles in shaping lifespan, even when genetic predisposition is high. Environmental degradation, access to health care, and modifiable risk factors can significantly alter life expectancy, sometimes outweighing genetic influences.
- Environmental and socioeconomic factors such as pollution, clean water, and health infrastructure are major determinants of life expectancy, especially in low-resource settings 9.
- Many genetic risks for diseases affecting lifespan are modifiable through health behaviors (e.g., smoking, blood pressure control), suggesting intervention potential regardless of genetic background 4 5.
- Studies note that genetic risk alleles for common diseases are often present in long-lived individuals, potentially buffered by protective factors or healthy environments 5.
- Non-genetic factors, particularly lifestyle, can impact health and longevity even among genetically predisposed individuals 5 9.
How do heritability estimates compare between humans and animal models?
Animal models, especially inbred mice and fruit flies, often show higher heritability estimates for lifespan, sometimes approaching or exceeding 50%. However, these results may not translate directly to humans due to differences in environmental control, genetic diversity, and methodological approaches.
- Inbred mouse studies report genetic determination of longevity between 48% and 79%, with evidence for overdominant inheritance 7.
- Fruit fly research highlights a highly context-dependent genetic architecture for lifespan, with thousands of implicated genes and strong genotype-by-environment interactions 10.
- The higher heritability observed in animal models suggests that genetic influences can be strong under controlled conditions, but human estimates are complicated by uncontrolled environmental effects 7 10.
- The new study’s higher estimate for humans is more in line with some animal research, but real-world complexities may still limit comparability 7 10.
What methodological challenges complicate lifespan heritability research?
Estimating the genetic contribution to lifespan is complicated by factors such as assortative mating, shared family environment, and incomplete cause-of-death data. The new study attempts to address some of these issues, but limitations remain.
- Assortative mating (non-random partner selection) can inflate heritability estimates in pedigree studies, leading to overestimation of genetic effects 3.
- Many studies lack detailed cause-of-death information, making it difficult to distinguish genetic from environmental causes of mortality 1 3.
- Environmental influences, both shared and non-shared, can obscure genetic contributions, especially in diverse populations 1 3 4.
- Advances in data collection and modeling may improve future estimates, but comprehensive, international datasets are still needed 1 3.
Future Research Questions
While the new study offers a revised estimate for the genetic contribution to human lifespan, substantial uncertainties remain. Future research is needed to address gaps in data diversity, to refine methodologies for separating genetic from environmental influences, and to clarify the implications for medical interventions and public health.
| Research Question | Relevance |
|---|---|
| Does lifespan heritability differ across populations with diverse ancestries? | Most genetic studies, including the new one, are based on populations of Northern European descent, limiting generalizability. More diverse cohorts are needed to assess whether heritability estimates hold globally 1 6. |
| How do specific lifestyle and environmental interventions modify the expression of genetic risk for shorter lifespan? | Understanding which interventions are most effective for individuals with high genetic risk could inform public health efforts and personalized medicine strategies 4 5 9. |
| What is the impact of assortative mating and shared environment on lifespan heritability estimates? | Methodological confounders such as assortative mating may inflate heritability estimates, so clarifying their effects is essential for accurate measurement 3. |
| Which genetic variants are most strongly associated with healthspan as opposed to lifespan? | Distinguishing between genes that influence overall lifespan and those that affect years lived in good health could help target interventions to improve quality of life, not just longevity 2 5 8. |
| Can improved cause-of-death data further refine estimates of genetic versus extrinsic influences on longevity? | The lack of cause-specific mortality data remains a major limitation for separating intrinsic and extrinsic determinants of lifespan; better data could lead to more precise estimates 1 3. |