Observational study suggests human longevity limits are yet to be reached — Evidence Review

The latest study of nearly 400 million people across 450 regions in Western Europe finds no evidence that human longevity has reached its biological ceiling, as life expectancy continues to rise in leading regions. Most related research supports the notion that longevity limits are not yet fixed, though some earlier studies predicted stricter boundaries. The full study is available in Nature Communications.

• While some earlier studies suggested a likely ceiling near 85 years for average life expectancy, more recent research acknowledges continued gains in longevity, particularly in regions with favorable socioeconomic and health conditions 1 3 11.
• Genetic, lifestyle, and environmental factors all play significant roles in shaping life expectancy, and evidence suggests that improvements in these areas can continue to push longevity higher in certain populations 6 7 8 9 10.
• The new study’s finding of diverging regional trends aligns with research showing that social, behavioral, and economic disparities increasingly drive differences in both average lifespan and lifespan equality 12 13 14.

Study Overview and Key Findings

This large-scale, region-level analysis addresses a long-standing debate: are we approaching a biological limit to human longevity, or can further increases in life expectancy still be achieved? By analyzing harmonized mortality and demographic data from 13 Western European countries between 1992 and 2019, the study provides an unprecedented view of both progress and stagnation in different regions. It highlights not only the continued rise of life expectancy in certain areas but also emerging gaps driven by midlife mortality and socioeconomic factors.

Property	Value
Journal Name	Nature Communications
Population	Regions in western Europe
Sample Size	450 regions
Methods	Observational Study
Outcome	Life expectancy trends across regions
Results	Human longevity limits have not been reached; gains continue.

Literature Review: Related Studies

To place these findings in context, we searched the Consensus paper database, which contains over 200 million research papers, using the following queries:

1. human longevity limits research
2. factors affecting human lifespan
3. advancements in life expectancy studies

Related Studies Table

Topic	Key Findings
Is there a fixed biological limit to human longevity?	- Early studies posited a likely upper limit for average life expectancy around 85 years, based on mortality reduction models 1 5 15. - More recent research shows evidence for continued gains in longevity, especially in countries with favorable health and social conditions, suggesting that a definitive biological ceiling has not yet been reached 3 4 11.
What factors drive regional and individual differences in life expectancy?	- Genetic factors account for about a quarter of the variation in human lifespan, but environmental, behavioral, and socioeconomic factors also play major roles 6 7 8 9 10. - Lifestyle choices such as smoking, diet, physical activity, and education significantly affect both average lifespan and years lived free from major chronic disease 6 9 12 13.
How do mortality trends and disparities evolve over time?	- Life expectancy and lifespan equality have generally improved over the past century, but recent decades have seen stagnation or divergence in some regions and groups, often due to increased midlife mortality 11 13 14. - Socioeconomic disparities, regional differences, and changing patterns of disease contribute to these unequal trends 10 13 14.

---

Is there a fixed biological limit to human longevity?

Many earlier models, based on hypothetical reductions in mortality, suggested that average life expectancy could not exceed about 85 years, even with major advances in disease elimination 1 5 15. However, accumulating evidence from both demographic projections and studies of extreme-age mortality indicate that life expectancy continues to rise in some populations, and that human mortality rates plateau rather than rise exponentially after age 105 3 4 11. The new European regional analysis supports this more optimistic view, finding that top-performing regions continue to gain in longevity with no sign of an impending ceiling.

• Early projections estimated an average biological limit to life expectancy at birth around 85 years, assuming major reductions in mortality at all ages 1.
• Studies of "longevity pioneers" show that human mortality rates level out after age 105, indicating that survival beyond this age is possible and not strictly limited by biology 4.
• Recent projections for industrialized countries forecast continued increases in life expectancy, with some national averages likely to surpass 90 years for women by 2030 11.
• The new study's findings of ongoing gains in leading European regions are consistent with these more recent projections and challenge the idea of an imminent biological ceiling 3 11 15.

What factors drive regional and individual differences in life expectancy?

Genetic factors explain roughly 20–30% of the variation in human lifespan, with the genetic influence growing stronger at advanced ages 7 8. However, environmental conditions, medical care, and especially modifiable lifestyle factors are crucial drivers of both average life expectancy and years lived free of chronic disease 6 9 10 12. The new study underscores the impact of midlife mortality (ages 55–74), which is sensitive to risk behaviors and socioeconomic conditions, as key to explaining regional divergence in longevity across Europe.

• Twin and genomic studies confirm a modest but meaningful genetic contribution to lifespan, with certain genetic loci associated with exceptional longevity 7 8 9.
• Healthy behaviors—such as not smoking, maintaining a normal weight, regular physical activity, and higher education—substantially prolong life expectancy and reduce the risk of chronic disease 6 9 12.
• Socioeconomic factors, including employment patterns and the impact of the 2008 financial crisis, have driven regional disparities in mortality and health outcomes 10 13.
• The study’s emphasis on midlife mortality aligns with findings that lifestyle changes at these ages have a large effect on both individual and population-level longevity 6 12.

How do mortality trends and disparities evolve over time?

While the 20th century saw broad improvements in both life expectancy and lifespan equality, recent decades have brought stagnation or reversals in some regions and demographic groups. These changes are often linked to social and economic inequalities, as well as shifts in the ages at which most mortality reductions occur 11 13 14. The new study documents a similar pattern: leading regions maintain steady progress, while others have stalled or regressed, particularly due to rising midlife mortality.

• The joint rise of life expectancy and lifespan equality was a hallmark of public health progress, but recent exceptions highlight the impact of stagnation or reversals in midlife mortality 14.
• Highly educated and economically advantaged groups have seen continued gains, while less advantaged populations have experienced stagnation or declines in life expectancy 10 13.
• Regional and socioeconomic disparities are increasingly important determinants of both the mean and the variability of lifespan 13 14.
• The new study’s identification of a "two-tier" Europe, with diverging longevity trends, echoes these findings and highlights the growing importance of addressing regional and social inequalities 11 13 14.

Future Research Questions

As the evidence points to ongoing increases in life expectancy in some regions but stagnation in others, further research is needed to clarify the mechanisms behind these trends, understand the interplay between biology and environment, and identify effective interventions. Important gaps remain regarding the precise causes of midlife mortality trends, the potential for further gains, and the role of health disparities.

Research Question	Relevance
What are the key determinants of rising midlife mortality in lagging regions of Europe?	Understanding the drivers behind increased mortality at ages 55–74 is essential to reversing stagnation and narrowing regional disparities in life expectancy 6 12 13 14.
How do genetic and lifestyle factors interact to influence exceptional longevity?	Exploring the interplay between genes and environment may clarify why some individuals and regions continue to see gains in longevity while others do not, and could inform targeted interventions 7 8 9 10.
Can policy interventions effectively reduce regional disparities in life expectancy?	Identifying and evaluating policies that successfully address socioeconomic, behavioral, and healthcare inequalities can help close the gap between leading and lagging regions 10 11 13.
What is the potential impact of future medical and biotechnological advances on human longevity?	Medical breakthroughs could further extend healthy lifespan, but their real-world effects depend on accessibility and integration with public health measures 2 5 15.
How will the COVID-19 pandemic affect long-term life expectancy trends in Europe?	The long-term effects of the pandemic on mortality patterns and health disparities remain uncertain and require close monitoring and analysis 11 13.